- Billionsof rows analyzed across ~9 enterprise systems
- ~95business rules drafted and refined with AI
- 120merchandise planners in the potential user population
Merchandise Planner Execution
Turning complex reconciliation work into recommendations a merchandise planner can review, approve, and act on in minutes.
The problem
Merchandise planners keep store assortments aligned across three sources: what the store is told to set, what downstream systems are told, and what merchants say the store should carry. When those sources disagree, merchandise planners reconcile them manually.
A single case can take a full day to resolve, and much of the decision-making relies on tribal knowledge that can take months to develop.
What I did
Tested the assumption first. Leadership believed store reset projects were the biggest source of misalignment. Using BigQuery, SQL, and Claude, I analyzed billions of rows across approximately nine enterprise systems and discovered that most misalignment accumulated during everyday maintenance activities, outside of store reset projects entirely.
Reset the strategy. Based on the findings, we focused on day-to-day assortment maintenance, an area fully within our team’s control, with fewer dependencies and enough volume to validate improvements quickly. We selected product drops as the first pilot because they represented the largest source of misalignment and were trending in the wrong direction.
Prototyped the workflow with AI. Using Claude, my merchandising domain knowledge, and existing training resources, I codified tribal knowledge into approximately 95 business rules and built a rules-engine prototype. The experience provides merchandise planners with a single recommendation they can approve, adjust, or dismiss, creating a more consistent and scalable decision-making process.
Responsible AI
I validate AI-generated outputs before they reach users by re-running key metrics directly in BigQuery, reviewing results with engineering partners, and keeping rules in draft until merchandise planners provide feedback.
That process surfaced an AI-generated metric that incorrectly treated “every system agrees a store should not carry an item” as less valid than “every system agrees a store should carry it,” which would have distorted both reporting and recommendation logic.
Where it stands
A pilot involving approximately a dozen super-user merchandise planners is currently underway, representing an opportunity that could eventually support roughly 120 merchandise planners.
Success will be measured through reduced misalignment, lower merchandise planner effort per case, and at least 90% of recommendations being approved as-is.